Go Back  Xtreme Visual Basic Talk > General Discussion > Forum Questions / Concerns / Comments > Request for a new forum area.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-10-2012, 06:22 PM
Gruff's Avatar
Gruff Gruff is offline
Bald Mountain Survivor

Super Moderator
* Expert *
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 5,883
Default Request for a new forum area.


I would like to see a new top level forum area called "IDE Options" With sub areas for different versions of VB. Currently these sort of questions are scattered to the winds.
__________________
Burn the land and boil the sea
You can't take the sky from me


~T
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-10-2012, 09:38 PM
hDC_0 hDC_0 is offline
Contributor

* Expert *
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 522
Default re: gruff suggestion

Quote:
I would like to see a new top level forum area called "IDE Options",
with sub areas for different versions of VB.
Currently these sort of questions are scattered to the winds.
I agree with Gruff's suggestion.

I would also see it as a good place to move "IDE Customization:Tips & Tricks" posts,
like this recent one.

But besides dealing with IDE customization, it could also contain threads
that explore little talked about (and maybe advanced) functionality in the VS.Net IDE perhaps..?

Although many of these types of threads end up n the General sub-forum,
they relatively quickly move off that sub-forum's current page and "disappear" into the forum's archive
where only just the right search parameters can unearth them again.

Having them all in one place means the moderators and experts can quickly
reference them from inside one forum.

As a "for instance" (and this is only one small part of what might addressed
by threads inside this new forum): MEF

MEF = Managed Extensibility Framework
Haven't heard much about it - well it has talked about.

some Automation-related links:
Automation and Extensibility for Visual Studio
Referencing Automation Assemblies and the DTE2 Object
Building Composable Apps in .NET 4 with the Managed Extensibility Framework
Automation and the Visual Studio .NET Automation Model
The Spectrum of Visual Studio .NET Automation
The Automation Objects Chart
Dynamic Source Code Generation and Compilation
VBCodeProvider Class

I bookmarked this AtmaWeapon post where MEF,
DI (Dependency Injection) and IOC (Inversion of Control) are all mentioned:
Quote:
This is a powerful concept, but it gets even more powerful when taken to the extreme.
In a normal case, you're only injecting interface implementations that are part of your own assembly.
What if, when your application started up, instead of using hard-coded classes for injection
it checked a configuration file that told it where to look for dependencies to inject?
You could conceivably write an application framework that lets the user modify everything,
from the UI to the business logic, without recompiling the application!
MEF works in a similar way; you tell it where to look for dependencies and it applies them for you.
Note: Not all forum members have fastidious compulsion for bookmarking that I have
and important posts like these could potentially be missed by new forum members
not knowing what to search for
(and sometimes too afraid to admit that).

This new forum could conceivably deal with
System.ComponentModel.Design Namespace questions,
like if someone wanted to develop a custom root designer
(this thread is the only one I know of that talks about root designers,
but I wish there were more).

Creating new forums is a big thing (and somewhat of a hassle),
so I know a decision won't be made impulsively,
but hopefully it will be given a real consideration.

Also hopefully more people will weight in with their thoughts..

Maybe they can ask themselves:
"Do you really understand the VS.Net IDE completely,
(including understanding all that it can do)"?

Is this a topic you would hope to encourage members to ask more about
(and read through the threads to find out what insights the experts of the forum might have to share)?

Last edited by hDC_0; 06-10-2012 at 10:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-11-2012, 06:26 AM
dilettante's Avatar
dilettante dilettante is offline
Underclocked lifestyle

Forum Leader
* Guru *
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,184
Default

I'd almost like to see a new area for "Web Scraping, SMS, SMTP, and other Server Abuse and Spamming Techniques." No need for separate sections by compiler since I plan to ignore all such questions.

On a more realistic note:

Shouldn't these new forums go with the tools rather than in another new area far away from the different tools? And wow, with a new .Net IDE every two years wouldn't there be a lot of repetition?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-11-2012, 06:08 PM
Gruff's Avatar
Gruff Gruff is offline
Bald Mountain Survivor

Super Moderator
* Expert *
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 5,883
Default

Not if you volanteer to keep it clean.

Actually I was thinking of VB.NET only so I guess that lets you off the hook

VB.NET options are many and contain many that are difficult to understand.
---

What Existing area were you thinking of putting this sort of thing under?
I thought about it some and If we buried it below an existing forum area I am not sure users would notice it.
__________________
Burn the land and boil the sea
You can't take the sky from me


~T
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-11-2012, 06:48 PM
dilettante's Avatar
dilettante dilettante is offline
Underclocked lifestyle

Forum Leader
* Guru *
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,184
Default

I just took a serious browse through the existing headings and I think you're right: it needs its own area.

I guess it was the idea that VB, .Net, Web programming, etc. were all going to be lumped together that I was reacting to.

Nevermind!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-27-2012, 01:24 AM
hDC_0 hDC_0 is offline
Contributor

* Expert *
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 522
Default Request for a follow-up..

It has been a few weeks so I have requested a follow-up on this thread
in a place (hopefully) monitored by some of the forum's moderators
(and maybe forum's admin people).

No guarantee of course that anyone who has the power to approve (let alone implement),
this suggestion will ever deem it worthy of a response..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Advertisement:





Free Publications
The ASP.NET 2.0 Anthology
101 Essential Tips, Tricks & Hacks - Free 156 Page Preview. Learn the most practical features and best approaches for ASP.NET.
subscribe
Programmers Heaven C# School Book -Free 338 Page eBook
The Programmers Heaven C# School book covers the .NET framework and the C# language.
subscribe
Build Your Own ASP.NET 3.5 Web Site Using C# & VB, 3rd Edition - Free 219 Page Preview!
This comprehensive step-by-step guide will help get your database-driven ASP.NET web site up and running in no time..
subscribe
 
 
-->